Movie titles are always causing problems.

2012’s theatrically-titled

The Avengers

was renamed

as both

Marvel’s The Avengers

and

Avengers Assemble

for home video to avoid confusion with the 1998 Sean Connery/Uma Thurman film of the same name. Clark Kent and Bruce Wayne’s epic showdown began as

Batman v Superman

, but eventually tacked on the subtitle

Dawn of Justice

ahead of its marketing campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Titles reveal a lot about a movie and its content, so its not exactly surprising when a studio wants its fingerprints all over it.

RUMOR

Zack Snyder’s rendition of

Justice League

appears to have hit another speed bump.

According to Twitter user

@TheComixKid of Geeks WorldWide

, higher-ups at DC Films are not keen on the title

Zack Snyder’s Justice League

for the director’s cut of the 2017 team-up flick.

ADVERTISEMENT

I did some asking around n it sounds like the issues with the name Zack Snyder’s Justice League r at the DC level bc his name comes first n this claims ownership, notice no DC stuff has really done this before as it sets a legal precedent n favors the creator over the company pic.twitter.com/OSEg81vm5G

WHAT THIS MEANS

Buckle up kids, let’s talk Hollywood logistics.

Warner Bros. and DC Films are understandably hesitant to include Zack Snyder’s name in the HBO Max rendition of

Justice League

due to ownership concerns. As

@TheComixKid

laid out, calling the film

Zack Snyder’s Justice League

gives the director precedence over the studio, and while he may be the one putting the most work into it, Warner Bros. is the one funding the

extremely expensive cut.

While in theory this is Snyder’s cut, it is still DC’s footage. The reason it took almost three years to get a confirmation that a Snyder cut was coming was because Zack does not have the authority to complete and distribute the project on his own, Warner Bros. does.

ADVERTISEMENT

So why the dispute? They came to an agreement, right? Well yes, but including Snyder’s name in the title would put the director and the studio back at square one.

Across all entertainment mediums, professional sports, music, the film industry and beyond, no one person is bigger than the machine. Record labels do not go by The Weeknd presents Republic Records, and sports teams don’t advertise as the Boston Celtics starring Kemba Walker. The same goes for film. DC likely wants to avoid a dangerous precedent of attaching directors’ names to project titles, and that starts by axing Zack Snyder from HBO Max’s

Justice League

.

Unfair? Maybe, but that’s showbiz baby.

ADVERTISEMENT

HBO Max presents Justice League directed but not owned by Zack Snyder

(did I get that right?) is due on its streaming service Spring 2021.

Movie titles are always causing problems.

2012’s theatrically-titled

The Avengers

was renamed

as both

Marvel’s The Avengers

and

Avengers Assemble

for home video to avoid confusion with the 1998 Sean Connery/Uma Thurman film of the same name. Clark Kent and Bruce Wayne’s epic showdown began as

Batman v Superman

, but eventually tacked on the subtitle

Dawn of Justice

ahead of its marketing campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Titles reveal a lot about a movie and its content, so its not exactly surprising when a studio wants its fingerprints all over it.

RUMOR

Zack Snyder’s rendition of

Justice League

appears to have hit another speed bump.

According to Twitter user

@TheComixKid of Geeks WorldWide

, higher-ups at DC Films are not keen on the title

Zack Snyder’s Justice League

for the director’s cut of the 2017 team-up flick.

I did some asking around n it sounds like the issues with the name Zack Snyder’s Justice League r at the DC level bc his name comes first n this claims ownership, notice no DC stuff has really done this before as it sets a legal precedent n favors the creator over the company pic.twitter.com/OSEg81vm5G

WHAT THIS MEANS

Buckle up kids, let’s talk Hollywood logistics.

Warner Bros. and DC Films are understandably hesitant to include Zack Snyder’s name in the HBO Max rendition of

Justice League

due to ownership concerns. As

@TheComixKid

laid out, calling the film

Zack Snyder’s Justice League

gives the director precedence over the studio, and while he may be the one putting the most work into it, Warner Bros. is the one funding the

extremely expensive cut.

While in theory this is Snyder’s cut, it is still DC’s footage. The reason it took almost three years to get a confirmation that a Snyder cut was coming was because Zack does not have the authority to complete and distribute the project on his own, Warner Bros. does.

So why the dispute? They came to an agreement, right? Well yes, but including Snyder’s name in the title would put the director and the studio back at square one.

Across all entertainment mediums, professional sports, music, the film industry and beyond, no one person is bigger than the machine. Record labels do not go by The Weeknd presents Republic Records, and sports teams don’t advertise as the Boston Celtics starring Kemba Walker. The same goes for film. DC likely wants to avoid a dangerous precedent of attaching directors’ names to project titles, and that starts by axing Zack Snyder from HBO Max’s

Justice League

.

Unfair? Maybe, but that’s showbiz baby.

HBO Max presents Justice League directed but not owned by Zack Snyder

(did I get that right?) is due on its streaming service Spring 2021.